On 12/22/10, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > About a year ago, we discussed replacing SUNW package functionality > with our own, possibly using CSWX as a prefix.
that would be bad. we should stick to "CSW" exclusively. > Should we use CSWXexim? Would pkgutil, pkg-get and the catalog tools > play nicely with this? What about naming it CSWsunw-exim and then > only including it in a special catalog? Side catalog is fine. OR... include replacement functionality natively in exim, and allow replacement of local binaries via csw.conf. With default to "no". > I see the MTA packages and things like cups using this to replace > system functionality...is there enough merit outside of these few > packages to actually spend time on this? Oooo, two birds with one stone. or in this case, two questions with one answer. "default=no" ;-) _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
