On 23/12/10, 02:12:10, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote regarding [csw-maintainers] CSWX packages:
> About a year ago, we discussed replacing SUNW package functionality > with our own, possibly using CSWX as a prefix. I seem to recall that > we thought placing these packages in a separate catalog was the way to > go. As I'm now working on the exim package, I'd like look at actually > doing this to get away from the request script and potential sendmail > binary replacement dance it does. This won't work with zones. > I see the MTA packages and things like cups using this to replace > system functionality...is there enough merit outside of these few > packages to actually spend time on this? I don't have a problem leaving /usr/lib/sendmail in situ and system programs like /usr/bin/mail work via sendmail when exim is the MTA. It's better to fix programs that assume system paths rather than alter the system paths. James. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
