On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:02 AM, James Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Following these external links takes us to clamav. My opinion is clamav > shouldn't be delivering the user databases at all so the question of > where this package delivers them is void. I'm not asking for any change > to clam (my opinion didn't count, the maintainer's opinion was clear and > I now make my own clamav packages with freshclam control), just please > don't use clamav as a case study for /var.
I think it's more than two years ago so I don't remember having a strong opinion about it, it was actually me posting for guidance, not being blocked by Phil as usual. The response was mixed so the main reason for delivering the files was that the source did so and my package already did so I just kept doing it, not because I absolutely didn't want it another way. With these new complications ahead I would much rather just remove the files from the package. /peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
