On 06/01/11, 08:34:33, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote regarding Re: [csw-maintainers] [policy] files/dirs in /var/opt/csw:
> We discussed all this on the submit mailing list (look for the "newpkgs > clamav, libclam6, libclam6_devel" thread starting at > http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2010-November/001501.h tml, > continued at > http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2010-December/001659.h tml > since October. > You had at least 5 people giving their view on this subject, among them > 2 members of the current board. Why do you want specifically the opinion > of the board members? The other maintainers opinion doesn't count? Following these external links takes us to clamav. My opinion is clamav shouldn't be delivering the user databases at all so the question of where this package delivers them is void. I'm not asking for any change to clam (my opinion didn't count, the maintainer's opinion was clear and I now make my own clamav packages with freshclam control), just please don't use clamav as a case study for /var. James. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
