Hi

If "announcements" are important enough to be designated as such,
rather than news.. then they should be kept in a separate area.
Otherwise, why bother to have a separate designation of
"announcements" in the first place?
I do agree with this. I prefer to separate informations regarding to the nature and importance. That's about structure. But Sebastian is right that current data are outdated. I'll try to add a few posts when mirrors will be sync. Later there wil be an automatic feed for this.

I have to do some cleanup in feeds... actually this is why you have both an entry in the top menu bar and an icon on the right. They link to the same thing, i can't suppress on without modifying the other. It's not complicated, but i have to change some code in the next days.

I have created a page with only one set of news, whatever you call it. It does not look so well, and it does not really look like a front page.

That could be interesting.
Tweets are easy to add. Once coded it's automatic. Press releases will have to be done by hand. Hopefully there is not a dozen a such news in a month ;)
3) Releases and updates: Is this going to be filled with our automated
YesI think the old "weekly updates" section was more useful.
The weekly html-window generation is stil going on -- its just not
displayed. It could be easily modified to fit any newer desired
formatting.
It will replace soon updates or will be merged with updates. Some php code to write

cheers
W.

--
William                     http://www.wbonnet.net

http://www.opencsw.org      Community SoftWare for Solaris

_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.

Reply via email to