On 1/14/11, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > at the moment we have two CVS packages: > > cvs 1.11.23 in /opt/csw > cvs_feature 1.12.13 in /opt/csw/cvs_feature > > I did a brief search on the web if there is a compelling reason to > ship those two different version but have found no real indication. > As I am no hardcode user I would like to ask if anyone has a strong > opinion on keeping these two separate. I have already respun cvs > packages at > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#cvs > where cvs will be updated to 1.12.13 and /opt/csw/cvs_feature is > a link to "." making sure 3rd party scripts depending on > CSWcvs-feature won't break. > >
ermm.. would you post more details on how you plan to unify them please? I for one, dont understand the ramifications of what you wrote above. what is the significance of the symlink? And what if any, is "lost"? one would presume that "cvs_feature".. has more features. Is this no longer true? You said no "compelling" reason. but you dont say they are identical, either. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
