Hi Phil, Am 17.01.2011 um 19:28 schrieb Philip Brown: > Okay, sounds like good reason for unifying. Looks like main original > cvs hasnt been updated for over two years. > > That being said, I'd like to suggest one change. > Rather than forcing the cvs_feature symlink into the cvs package, I'd > suggest you update the cvs_feature package, to depend on new CVS, and > deliver the symlink. > That way the "cvs" package is more clean.
I already implemented it exactly this way :-) Submitting it then. Best regards -- Dago > > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> .... >> It sounds to me that "cvs stable" is long outdated and of no practical >> use as all fixes go to "feature". >> >> > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
