Philip Brown <[email protected]> writes: > On 1/14/11, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: >> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Sat Jan 08 16:54:57 -0500 2011: >> >>> The vote is open from the 9th - 13th inclusive. As with the board >>> vote, I have no indication of time zone handling for this, so I made >>> it a 4 day window that includes weekend and weekday times. >> >> The results are in: >> >> Files and directories are allowed to be delivered to /var/opt/csw >> directly by the prototype of a package. => 8 votes (57%) >> >> Directories may be delivered to /var/opt/csw by the prototype of a >> package, but files may not. => 4 votes (28%) >> >> Neither files nor directories may be delivered to /var/opt/csw by the >> prototype of a package. => 2 votes (14%) >> >> Phil: please adjust your scripts to allow packages delivering >> directories and/or files via the prototype to be allowed through. > > > I will for now. However, I have a complaint. As I mentioned > previously, your voting writeup unfairly biased the vote. > Because you sent a global vote invite to all active maintainers, but > you included NOTHING about potential reasons why people might consider > each option. > This leaves people who have not read this thread, yet are *still > voting*, in essentially the following situation:
There is no way to verify this assumption. I'd say: trust the voters to have done their due diligence and read the maintainers list. The chance that somebody votes "blindly" is idempotent for those reading or not. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
