James Lee <[email protected]> writes: > On 17/01/11, 14:10:08, Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote regarding > Re: [csw-maintainers] [policy] files/dirs in /var/opt/csw: > > >> > Also please can someone remove the references to supporting NFS share >> > of /opt/csw (as we now don't), that is eg: >> > >> > http://www.opencsw.org/about/core-principles/ >> > http://www.opencsw.org/use-it/sharing-optcsw/ >> > http://www.opencsw.org/about/faq/ >> > >> > >> > and probably some others. Further it would be good to add an additional >> > note and make an announcement to explain the change in policy. > >> I'm begging for a different opinion: we still support sharing /opt/csw >> through NFS for most of our packages > > "most" isn't support. It's unsupported but if it works for the subset > of package you chose then I'm not going to stop you - until my package > breaks your system. > >> There are also gray cats. > > We've not made a rule about cats.
This is a way to say that a manichean attitude is a little bit rigid. Manichean is when you say "'most' isn't support". Non manichean is when 'most' is support with exceptions and corresponding documented warnings. With all due respect I think that this is a finicky discussion. Nobody talks here about ayatollish absolute support except if we wish to stay in the pure Persian tradition. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
