On 1/18/11, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your question about naming brings up an interesting point. Perhaps > the with magic.mgc shouldn't be named CSW<libraryname>-common, but > CSW<libraryname>-<providedfilename>, which in our case would be > CSWlibmagic-magic. Potential options for naming: > > CSWlibmagic-common > CSWlibmagic-magic
libmagic_magic gets my vote. > I'm not convinced whether it's better to provide magic.mgc in an > isolated file. We would still need a package for > /opt/csw/share/man/man3/libmagic.3 and > /opt/csw/share/man/man4/magic.4. It should be neither CSWgfile, nor > CSWlibmagic (deprecated), nor CSWlibmagic1 (libmagic.so.1 only), nor > CSWlibmagic-magic (magic.mgc only). I think we have a fairly clear existing "standard" on that already. libmagic_doc _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
