On 1/18/11, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Am 18.01.2011 um 20:56 schrieb Philip Brown: >>> I'm not convinced whether it's better to provide magic.mgc in an >>> isolated file. We would still need a package for >>> /opt/csw/share/man/man3/libmagic.3 and >>> /opt/csw/share/man/man4/magic.4. It should be neither CSWgfile, nor >>> CSWlibmagic (deprecated), nor CSWlibmagic1 (libmagic.so.1 only), nor >>> CSWlibmagic-magic (magic.mgc only). >> >> I think we have a fairly clear existing "standard" on that already. >> libmagic_doc > > IIRC it is different. section 3 stuff goes into *-dev and > section 4 stuff should be in the packages with the containing > files *unless* we have a documentation package which should > only be made if the documentation is really large (like qt).
What do you base those statements on? I dont recall ever reading something like the above in our standards. If people want to put ALL the doc files in _doc, including development related documentation, there is nothing stopping them that I am aware of. _devel, is at minimum, for files *required* for developing/compiling. Technically speaking, man pages and other docs are not "required" there. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
