Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]> writes: > Continuing a topic started last month[1], I'd like to put forward a > proposal[2] for shared library placement. Most of our package would > not be affected by it; it's most of interest to the maintainers of > packages which put shared libraries under custom prefixes. For > details, please refer to the proposal.
I globally agree with the exception of the handling of private shared libraries: it should be optional to put these in a specific directory with the exception of file name conflicts which, given the naming convention is very improbable. BTW, your phrasing is "should" which is alright for me vs. "must" which would be not. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
