2011/2/5 Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]>: > 2011/2/5 Philip Brown <[email protected]>: >> To me, "libraries [..] should be kept in [...]" implies that "the >> actual library, ie: the file" should be kept in... >> >> That would need to be cleared up, to explicitly allow symlinks. > > Doesn't the word "should" imply that in well-grounded cases a > different approach can be used?
No it doesnt. I understand what Peter F was saying, reguarding traditional RFC language. But lets make our regs readable to "common folks". Example: If you mean "usually", then say "usually". To most folks, "should" == "must". _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
