2011/2/8 Maciej Bliziński <[email protected]>: > > The text doesn't use the "a library or a symlink to it" expression > each time, because if we started to do this in every case where > symlinks could be used, the policy would be rather unreadable. >
Perhaps we need to take a very different wording style, rather than attempting to just make small changes. Something like, "The library needs to have a presence in /opt/csw/lib" or "the library needs to be linkable with -L/opt/csw/lib." Although personally, i think if we just settle the issue of symlinks now vs later, then the writing will be simpler. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
