On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> a) you did not verify you had tested it, or > > Of course I tested it. > >> b) you went too far in your updates. you did not merely patch the >> security hole, but changed the package. > > I used ISC's official solution to the security flaw, I even went the > extra mile to package it the same way it already was even though that > was extra work since it by that time was done differently. It sure was > a minimal change.
since you seem to have this fresh in your mind, and I do not... if you wish to discuss that specific incident further, perhaps you can dig up the specific email where I said the reason why it was not accepted. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
