Hi folks, Am 15.05.2011 um 22:16 schrieb Philip Brown: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Philip Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >>> a) you did not verify you had tested it, or >> >> Of course I tested it. >> >>> b) you went too far in your updates. you did not merely patch the >>> security hole, but changed the package. >> >> I used ISC's official solution to the security flaw, I even went the >> extra mile to package it the same way it already was even though that >> was extra work since it by that time was done differently. It sure was >> a minimal change. > > since you seem to have this fresh in your mind, and I do not... if you > wish to discuss that specific incident further, perhaps you can dig up > the specific email where I said the reason why it was not accepted.
All I could find was "all right then": http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/pkgsubmissions/2010-April/000578.html Best regards -- Dago _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
