On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:55 AM, John Ellson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm assuming that the ImageMagic fix is small and that we should have a new > set of packages in a few days, but Dago didn't say when he was going to be > back. > > I'm not even so worried about the web pages on this occasion. It just > seems to me that some scripts need to be fixed so that web updates are > atomic and only happen if batching is successful.
Would be useful. However, at my utility script level, there is unfortunately no concept of a maintainer-grouped-batch at the moment. There is only individual-package visibility. As I said, this isnt a problem with smaller grouped packages, so there isnt much incentive to write something fancier. I could in theory write something that would be more package-group aware. However, it would probably involve a lot of saved state, and a high (relative) degree of inner complexity. Which would mean high likelyhood of bugs. My gut level risk/reward analyzer suggests it would probably end up causing more problems than it would solve. > For this release of graphviz, I suggest just waiting a few days, and re batch. okie dokie. just give me a nudge :) _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
