Hi Peter On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:13:40PM +0200, Peter FELECAN wrote: > Ben Walton <[email protected]> writes: > > > Excerpts from Yann Rouillard's message of Fri Jun 08 10:35:20 -0400 2012: > > > >> This is done: > >> http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-openssl > >> > >> However, the resultat is that there is a group of 80 packages which > >> should be released together to avoid a dual linking runtime > >> situation for any of them or for their reverse dependancies. > > > > I think we're making good progress. As I have cycles, I'm tackling > > packages from retired maintainers that still look useful... > > > > Is anyone up for rebuilding the gnome/gtk stuff that's been orphaned? > > If not, we may need to make some hard choices about the future of this > > package set... > > > > Peter F: Is it something you'd consider? You're one of the few still > > building things that care about a desktop. > > I was quite sure that saying that I was putting my finger in the > wheels... For the moment I'm slowly migrating from private recipes to > GAR based ones. If my time permits I can look in gtk and then > gnome. What about glib?
You don't need to bother with (lib)gtk+2, I will take care of that. As for glib2, there is no dependency of ssl, so no worries. cheers rafi > -- > Peter > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. > _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
