I noticed that the package libssl1_0_0 contains not one, but two shared objects:
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/b60e3199428815622085fb93557a669f/files/ File: /opt/csw/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 File: /opt/csw/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 Since we're doing a larger rebuild effort right now, we should look at it now and think if it's better to have them together or separately. Here's a compiled list of sonames and numbers of dependent packages: libssl.so.0.9.7 => 5 libssl.so.0.9.8 => 167 libssl.so.1.0.0 => 1 libcrypto.so.0.9.7 => 6 libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => 197 libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => 2 So there are packages that depend on libcrypto but don't depend on libssl. If we separated libcrypto from libssl, we'd reduce the dependency footprint of ~30 packages (197 - 167) by 1 package. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
