On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Romeo Theriault <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Romeo Theriault > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm planning to tackle the python library directory move from >>> /opt/csw/lib/python to /opt/csw/lib/python2.6 in order to remove some >>> of the hurdles that modules may experience when working within the CSW >>> environment. >> >> >> I'm not really clear on what the issue is. (?) Is it that some >> modules/tools expect the python2.6 directory but it's not there? > > > Nevermind, I just read your other email about the hack to get virtualenv > working. :)
Yeah, it's a poor assumption that the modules are making but...I think the original idea to have a non-versioned python library directory is that it would alleviate the need to rebuild every module for a major version upgrade as most thins would work on newer versions (binary modules exempted). Either way, it's better to fix our python layout even though it will mean a lot of rebuilding. I extracted the list of affected packages today and will post them to the wiki project page shortly. Thanks -Ben -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take the risk of thinking for yourself. Much more happiness, truth, beauty and wisdom will come to you that way. -Christopher Hitchens --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
