On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Ben Walton <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, it's a poor assumption that the modules are making but...I think > the original idea to have a non-versioned python library directory is > that it would alleviate the need to rebuild every module for a major > version upgrade as most thins would work on newer versions (binary > modules exempted).
I am probably way off, but wouldn't non-versioned libraries/trees not lead to weird crashes? I imagine not all python releases are binary compatible... C. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
