Hi Peter, Am 01.03.2013 um 13:26 schrieb pfelecan <[email protected]>: > I packaged TeXLive on February 25th and there were no errors during the > checkpkg phase. > > Trying to upload the packages I get an error about a shared library not > existing: > > * libXaw.so.5 could not be resolved for opt/csw/bin/xdvi-xaw, with rpath > ('/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST', '/opt/csw/lib', '/opt/csw/lib', > '/usr/openwin/lib', '/opt/csw/lib', '/usr/lib/$ISALIST', '/usr/lib', > '/lib/$ISALIST', '/lib'), expanded to ['/opt/csw/lib', > '/opt/csw/lib/amd64', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium+mmx', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium', > '/opt/csw/lib/i486', '/opt/csw/lib/i386', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro', > '/opt/csw/lib/i86', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro+mmx', '/opt/csw/lib', > '/opt/csw/lib', '/usr/openwin/lib', '/opt/csw/lib', '/usr/lib', > '/usr/lib/amd64', '/usr/lib/pentium+mmx', '/usr/lib/pentium', > '/usr/lib/i486', '/usr/lib/i386', '/usr/lib/pentium_pro', '/usr/lib/i86', > '/usr/lib/pentium_pro+mmx', '/usr/lib', '/lib', '/lib/amd64', > '/lib/pentium+mmx', '/lib/pentium', '/lib/i486', '/lib/i386', > '/lib/pentium_pro', '/lib/i86', '/lib/pentium_pro+mmx', '/lib'], while the > file was not present on the filesystem, nor in the packages under > examination. > > for the texlive-binaries package. > > However, the library libXaw.so.5 exits in /usr/openwin/lib on a Solaris 10 > installation. > > At the end of the upload output there is the usual phrase saying that: > > To see errors, run: > /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg --catalog-release unstable --os-release SunOS5.11 > --architecture i386 ... > > This makes me think that this can be specific to Solaris 11 but it's just a > supposition.
This is indeed the case. libXaw.so.5 is part of pkg:/x11/library/toolkit/libxaw5 which is specifically an addon: "This package provides a libXaw.so.5 binary for backwards compatibility with programs compiled on older releases of Solaris.". > In conclusion, as I wrote in the subject line, there is an incoherency > somewhere and not only about the incriminated library. > > Can a knowledgeable person have a look and suggest a corrective path? As we can't specify dependencies to such IPS packages yet I suggest that I reregister the packages from unstable11* now the package is installed. This should lead to checkpkg to pass. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
