Hi Peter, Am 01.03.2013 um 14:03 schrieb pfelecan <[email protected]>: >> Am 01.03.2013 um 13:26 schrieb pfelecan <pfelecan at opencsw.org>: >>> I packaged TeXLive on February 25th and there were no errors during the >>> checkpkg phase. >>> >>> Trying to upload the packages I get an error about a shared library not >>> existing: >>> >>> * libXaw.so.5 could not be resolved for opt/csw/bin/xdvi-xaw, with rpath >>> ('/opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST', '/opt/csw/lib', '/opt/csw/lib', >>> '/usr/openwin/lib', '/opt/csw/lib', '/usr/lib/$ISALIST', '/usr/lib', >>> '/lib/$ISALIST', '/lib'), expanded to ['/opt/csw/lib', >>> '/opt/csw/lib/amd64', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium+mmx', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium', >>> '/opt/csw/lib/i486', '/opt/csw/lib/i386', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro', >>> '/opt/csw/lib/i86', '/opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro+mmx', '/opt/csw/lib', >>> '/opt/csw/lib', '/usr/openwin/lib', '/opt/csw/lib', '/usr/lib', >>> '/usr/lib/amd64', '/usr/lib/pentium+mmx', '/usr/lib/pentium', >>> '/usr/lib/i486', '/usr/lib/i386', '/usr/lib/pentium_pro', '/usr/lib/i86', >>> '/usr/lib/pentium_pro+mmx', '/usr/lib', '/lib', '/lib/amd64', >>> '/lib/pentium+mmx', '/lib/pentium', '/lib/i486', '/lib/i386', >>> '/lib/pentium_pro', '/lib/i86', '/lib/pentium_pro+mmx', '/lib'], while the >>> file was not present on the filesystem, nor in the packages under >>> examination. >>> >>> for the texlive-binaries package. >>> >>> However, the library libXaw.so.5 exits in /usr/openwin/lib on a Solaris 10 >>> installation. >>> >>> At the end of the upload output there is the usual phrase saying that: >>> >>> To see errors, run: >>> /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg --catalog-release unstable --os-release SunOS5.11 >>> --architecture i386 ... >>> >>> This makes me think that this can be specific to Solaris 11 but it's just a >>> supposition. >> >> This is indeed the case. libXaw.so.5 is part of >> pkg:/x11/library/toolkit/libxaw5 which is >> specifically an addon: "This package provides a libXaw.so.5 binary for >> backwards compatibility >> with programs compiled on older releases of Solaris.". >> >>> In conclusion, as I wrote in the subject line, there is an incoherency >>> somewhere and not only about the incriminated library. >>> >>> Can a knowledgeable person have a look and suggest a corrective path? > >> As we can't specify dependencies to such IPS packages yet I suggest that I >> reregister >> the packages from unstable11* now the package is installed. This should lead >> to checkpkg >> to pass. > > Thank you Dag. When the re-registering is done let me know so as I can try to > upload again.
I reregistered the unstable11* packages as documented in http://wiki.opencsw.org/checkpkg Please try again, hopefully your issue is fixed now. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
