Hi, I think there are two topics here: 1. how to handle NMU, 2. how to handle orphaned packages.
If you have a lot of bugs assigned to you, it's probably because the maintainers are not active anymore and didn't upload new packages. In fact, the packages are rather orphaned. For 2., I would propose to create a dedicated fake maintainer. The emails address of this fake maintainer would be a mailing-list, all interested maintainers in helping to keep orphaned package up to date would be subscribed to this list. For 1., it might be better to register the official maintainer somewhere (the easiest is in the Makefile). If someone else uploads a package it could just add an "UPLOADER" field in the pkginfo file but would not change the official maintainer of the package. Yann 2013/4/8 Peter Bonivart <[email protected]> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd like to bring this topic back to discussion. Is there something > > easy we could do right away? For instance, setting the maintainer > > field to a fake maintainer? > > Yes, some placeholder would work. But I think it should only be > allowed to use either your own name or the placeholder, not any > maintainers name. > > /peter > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::. >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
