2013/4/10 Yann Rouillard <[email protected]>: >> The question is, who will implement the changes. I'm currently working >> on restoring buildfarm functionality, I can't take on more or nothing >> will get done. > > Yes that's the question. I can work on it after having finished the ssl > migration and fixed a problem with the scripts updating the package history > on the web site.
Yes, looks good. One project at a time. >> Maybe pkgrequests would be best? If someone is making an inquiry about >> an orphaned package, it's very similar to someone making an inquiry to >> add something to our catalog - for us it means potentially starting to >> maintain a package we haven't been maintaining. > > Among the existing list, pkgrequests is the best match. > > So are we ok to use a fake maintainer like this one: "Orphaned package" > <[email protected]> ? Sounds good to me. One thing I'm not sure about - is the world able/permitted to send email to that list directly? A side comment - maybe we shouldn't publish our mailing list email addresses for spammer harversters to pick up. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
