because this in gobject-introspection build recipe:

# Python isn't 64-bit yet
#BUILD64 = 1

you should not enable gobject-introspection for 64bit builds??

Carsten


Am 06.05.13 schrieb Laurent Blume  <[email protected]>:
> On 06/05/13 11:42, Jan Holzhueter wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Am 06.05.13 11:37, schrieb Ralph Boehme:
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>the build farm has CSWgobject-introspection-dev, but it's missing
> >>CSWgobject-introspection. As a result packages (e.g. dconf)
> >>checking for the presence for this toolkit finds it (via the .pc
> >>file from the -dev package), but then the whole machinery to drive
> >>introspection is missing as that lives in the
> >>CSWgobject-introspection package.
> >>
> >>Thanks!
> >
> >Will install it.
> >
> >@Carsten seems like you should change the deps from the -dev package
> >to also include CSWgobject-introspection
> 
> I was hitting similar introspection issues when trying to rebuild libgconf.
> After the update above, it picks it up, but the result is a horrible mess:
> 
> http://dpaste.com/1112141/
> 
> The PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH are correct during configure time, but at this 
> point in the build, introspection runs the Solaris pkg-config (not OpenCSW's, 
> since that one has the default of /opt/csw/lib/pkgconfig) and without a 
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH set, so it fails to find gio-2.0.pc.
> 
> Below, it tries to runs gcc, but this is a 64 bit build, and gcc is called 
> without -m64 (please note that configure found Studio, so introspection just 
> uses its own).
> 
> So I say, this introspection package is broken at this point, and needs to be 
> fixed, and preferably removed until then, as it breaks things.
> 
> Laurent
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.

Reply via email to