"Maciej (Matchek) BliziĆski" <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/7/19 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> >> (snip) >> 3. 2.7 becomes the default python for our distribution, thus new >> packages depends on it and the gar python recipe adapts to this but >> using CSWpy- prefix; I'm hesitating to add that we can obsolete >> CSWpython-xxx by CSWpython27-xxx > > I can imagine the following scenario: > > User: I upgraded CSW stuff and my application is not working, it fails > with "ImportError: No module named foo" > Us: Which Python are you using? > User: Python 2.6 > Us: We made Python 2.7 the default and we're removing Python 2.6 support. > User: But my application requires Python 2.6. > Us: Then update your application. > User: It's a third party application, we cannot modify it.
What about this: > 2013/7/19 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> >> I'm still hoping that someone explains me why code written for 2.6 >> cannot be run by a 2.7 interpreter. which is, I think, crucial to our discussion. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
