"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <[email protected]> writes: > 2013/7/20 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> >> >> Look at what Debian has done to make the transition. They are not using >> specific 2.7 packages, the differentiation is 2 versus 3 which is >> understandable as there is an incompatibility between code written for 2 >> running in 3. > > I don't think they broke Python 2.6. Or did they? They have a special > mechanism for sharing modules between 2.6 and 2.7.
Which is? Anyhow, they don't have the equivalent of CSWpy27-foo. A 2.x package is a 2.x package. >> I would like to be understood that what I'm aiming at is 2 pronged: >> >> 1. minimal investment >> 2. fastest turn around > > With Python 2.6 being expendable? Why do you think so? In my current endeavor, I come to realize that our Python eco-system is brain damaged. What I propose is not to lobotomize, but to have brain surgery. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
