2013/7/28 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: > I already read the code and it's a nice piece of engineering. It's not > exactly what I had in mind or wrote myself. We will test it throughly > when the first complete implementation is finished.
All the basic pieces are now in place. I dropped the fifos in favor of regular files. I kept the file descriptors to avoid repeatedly opening and closing the temporary files. I'm happy with the way it is now, we can proceed with testing. I did not implement compiling one .py file multiple times for different Python versions. The main concern for the current CAS is the suitability of pattern matching. Is it good enough to just match a part of the path to know which interpreter to use? It should be good enough for most packages, but I'm not sure what the corner cases / contrived path names could be. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
