2013/7/29 Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: > the only omission is using a different prefix for 2.6 and 2.7 packages. > > Tested it thoroughly and everything seems alright. > > Do you mind if I commit these changes? This way we have a necessary and > sufficient set of changes to support our new toy...
This line: PYTHON_MODULE_PACKAGE_PREFIX_2_7 = CSWpy- ...is fine as long as we don't rebuild the CSWpy- packages with Python 2.7; or more specifically, as long as the packages with the CSWpy- prefix do provide files in the /opt/csw/lib/python/site-packages or /opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages directories. This can be easily encoded into a check in checkpkg. I'm sure you understand the reasoning ‒ we don't want a regression in 2.6. Maciej _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
