Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Peter, > > Am 30.07.2013 um 20:20 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >> I have an issue as follows: >> >> - package pp has in its PKGFILES a set of files fp, explicitly defined >> - package pd has in its PKGFILES a set of file fd, implicitly defined >> through PKGFILES_DEVEL macro >> - the packages are defined in pp, pd order >> - the fp set is include in the fd set >> >> How can I exclude from fd the content of fp, i.e. complement it? >> >> Is there a known way or should I resort to my magic wand? > > > No magic wand needed :-) > > You can either use the respective expression from PKGFILES_DEVEL explicitly > or reset the components from PKGFILES_DEVEL to empty which belong to fp as > in the composite variable defined here: > http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk#L383 > like > PKGFILES_DEVEL_LIBTOOL = > to exclude *.la files from fd.
I'm not sure that this will do as fp is composed of include files, sub-tree of $(includedir), and fd contains all the relevant files from $(includedir). This is why I thought about the magic wand. In fact the question is how to exclude from pd some sub-trees. -- Peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
