Hi Peter, Am 30.07.2013 um 22:31 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: > Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 30.07.2013 um 20:20 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >>> I have an issue as follows: >>> >>> - package pp has in its PKGFILES a set of files fp, explicitly defined >>> - package pd has in its PKGFILES a set of file fd, implicitly defined >>> through PKGFILES_DEVEL macro >>> - the packages are defined in pp, pd order >>> - the fp set is include in the fd set >>> >>> How can I exclude from fd the content of fp, i.e. complement it? >>> >>> Is there a known way or should I resort to my magic wand? >> >> >> No magic wand needed :-) >> >> You can either use the respective expression from PKGFILES_DEVEL explicitly >> or reset the components from PKGFILES_DEVEL to empty which belong to fp as >> in the composite variable defined here: >> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk#L383 >> like >> PKGFILES_DEVEL_LIBTOOL = >> to exclude *.la files from fd. > > I'm not sure that this will do as fp is composed of include files, > sub-tree of $(includedir), and fd contains all the relevant files from > $(includedir). This is why I thought about the magic wand. In fact the > question is how to exclude from pd some sub-trees.
I see. Unfortunately there is no easy way for that, you must restrict the included pathes for fd to be disjunct with fp manually. Sorry. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
