James Lee <[email protected]> writes:

> I was ignored when a similar question arose for Solaris 8 but here
> goes anyway.
>
> Take a snapshot of the last working set of Solaris 9 packages and
> archive them. Do not piecemeal update as this breaks the set [as
> happened to the last the Solaris 8 set which became unusable].
>
> Thus only old system packages are provided to maintain old
> installations. Anyone using an old operating system will be more
> satisfied with an old working set than a newer broken one.

Let's not ignore this proposition this time. It has the usual common
sense that James used us to. How can we implement it and move forward?

-- 
Peter
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.

Reply via email to