Le 2015/03/18 21:39 +0100, Matchek a écrit: > I think we were still building for Solaris 8 until shortly before that > (measured in years). We stopped supporting Solaris 8 in March 2010. A > year and a half. An eye blink.
But since S8 did not, ever, support the 386, it truly made zero sense, even in 2010. Even in 2000, it made no sense. The last Solaris to support the 386 was 2.5.1 (and it was not exactly a recommended CPU...) Solaris truly attracts hardcore traditionalists :-D http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19620-01/805-4853/6j4jev6qc/index.html http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19504-01/802-5739/6i9fpme6d/index.html http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19504-01/802-5739/6i9fpme6c/index.html http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19695-01/802-1960/802-1960.pdf http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19457-01/801-6617/801-6617.pdf
