Hi Riccardo, Am 20.04.2015 um 09:34 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>: > Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: >> 2015-04-19 10:45 GMT-07:00 Riccardo Mottola<[email protected]>: >>> >What's the matter here? Why is everything fine on sol. 10? >> Maybe gnulinks were not updated for Solaris 9? >> >> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/4b2128388844389ad0a86c07ca12a33f/ >> >> You could update gnulinks and publish at the same time. (one >> csw-uploadpkg command). > > I am not yet uploading the binutils packages, still building & checking them. > > I have rebuilt gnulinks though, should I upload that one and afterwards > continue work on binutils or would this cause problems? What is this "links" > package?
Updating gnulinks is tricky. It goes like this: /opt/csw/gnu contains links to GNU programs without the „g“-prefix. Historically these links were shipped by CSWgnulinks. Then we got smarter and each packages shipped his own links (like CSWgmake ships /opt/csw/gnu/make) and they were removed one by one from CSWgnulinks. Both the updated package (e.g. CSWgmake) and CSWgnulinks need to be updated in sync and uploaded in the same run. As there have been no releases on Solaris 9 you need to investigate starting from the version of CSWgnulinks shipped in Solaris 9 which links have been updated and upload only that to Solaris 9 catalog. I suggest you undo the change to gnulinks/trunk and make a new branch for Solaris 9. Please keep in mind at the moment the Solaris 9 catalog works and it should prio 1 to not leave it in broken state. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
