Hi,
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
I just looked: you can just leave trunk alone as Solaris 10 unstable does not
ship
gnulinks any more.
I see, perhaps we shouldn't need it on solaris 9 either? I'm checking:
#GLINKPKGS = CSWbinutils CSWggetopt CSWgwhois
further down:
for p in $(GLINKPKGS); do \
this means this package shouldn't contain anything right now: no GLINKPKGS.
The package contains:
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/addr2line=../bin/gaddr2line
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/ar=../bin/gar
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/as=../bin/gas
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/c++filt=../bin/gc++filt
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/getopt=../bin/ggetopt
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/gprof=../bin/ggprof
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/ld=../bin/gld
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/nm=../bin/gnm
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/objcopy=../bin/gobjcopy
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/objdump=../bin/gobjdump
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/ranlib=../bin/granlib
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/readelf=../bin/greadelf
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/size=../bin/gsize
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/strings=../bin/gstrings
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/strip=../bin/gstrip
1 s none /opt/csw/gnu/whois=../bin/gwhois
I would say that if I update binutils getopt and whois for solaris 9, we
can throw away this package on Solaris 9 too, do you agree?
Could you explain like to a newbie "copy of trunk to branches/solaris9"
1) is solaris9 the "official" name we use?
Well, there is no official naming for branches. Just name it with a sensible
name,
„solaris9“ looks fine for me.
I will keep this "lesson" in mind when I need to e.g. branch gcc to
4.8/4.9 "forever" on Solaris 9.
I suppose this is what I also will need when branching for solaris 8
eventually.
Riccardo
