Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Peter, > > Am 21.04.2015 um 19:01 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >> Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> writes: >>> Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> It is not trivial if you like to create secure code that fits into a >>>>> single >>>>> page. >>>>> >>>>> BTW: I created na isaexec implementation based on the Sun implementation. >>>>> This was reworked not to depend on a libc function (as recent OpenSolaris >>>>> sources) and it still fits into a single page. >>>> >>>> Wouldn't be nice that you include your implementation in our isaexec >>>> package? >>> >>> Yesterday in the afternoon, I send my source to Dagobert. The next >>> schilytools >>> source tarball will include the current state of the source from 2010. I >>> did >>> not yet publish it as I originally planned to include BSD, Linux amd Mac OS >>> X >>> support first. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Dago, can you update our sources with what Joerg sent you? > > Essentially yes, but I am want to make a step back: the initial problem was > that > isaexec could not be found during checkinstall and we are now working on a > CSW-specific > implementation. This seems wrong to me. Can’t we trick checkpkg in thinking > isaexec is > provided and stick with the current implementation? Like, make isaexec a > symlink first > and then replace it with a copy of system isaexec followed by installf?
1. the implementation that we have is minimalist, having a more complete one is not a luxury; 2. take advantage of the required chnage to increase the quality of the package's content; 3. I don't get what you wish to do; what "system isaexec"? I don't see one on my Solaris 10. If you don't have the time do do it, send me the source and I'll do it. -- Peter
