Hi Peter, Am 22.04.2015 um 18:44 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: > Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> writes: >> Hi Peter, >> Am 21.04.2015 um 19:01 schrieb Peter FELECAN <[email protected]>: >>> Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> writes: >>>> Peter FELECAN <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> It is not trivial if you like to create secure code that fits into a >>>>>> single >>>>>> page. >>>>>> >>>>>> BTW: I created na isaexec implementation based on the Sun implementation. >>>>>> This was reworked not to depend on a libc function (as recent >>>>>> OpenSolaris >>>>>> sources) and it still fits into a single page. >>>>> >>>>> Wouldn't be nice that you include your implementation in our isaexec >>>>> package? >>>> >>>> Yesterday in the afternoon, I send my source to Dagobert. The next >>>> schilytools >>>> source tarball will include the current state of the source from 2010. I >>>> did >>>> not yet publish it as I originally planned to include BSD, Linux amd Mac >>>> OS X >>>> support first. >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Dago, can you update our sources with what Joerg sent you? >> >> Essentially yes, but I am want to make a step back: the initial problem was >> that >> isaexec could not be found during checkinstall and we are now working on a >> CSW-specific >> implementation. This seems wrong to me. Can’t we trick checkpkg in thinking >> isaexec is >> provided and stick with the current implementation? Like, make isaexec a >> symlink first >> and then replace it with a copy of system isaexec followed by installf? > > 1. the implementation that we have is minimalist, having a more complete > one is not a luxury;
Not really. Our implementation uses the isaexec shipped with Solaris and that implementation has no known issues. > 2. take advantage of the required chnage to increase the quality of the > package's content; I don’t see a problem with the contents, just that checkpkg does not know the path because it is done in postinstall with installf. > 3. I don't get what you wish to do; what "system isaexec"? I don't see > one on my Solaris 10. /usr/lib/isaexec Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
