Hi Riccardo,

Am 01.10.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>:
> On 2015-10-01 13:57:27 +0200 Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Am 01.10.2015 um 14:01 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]>:
>>> NM=gnm fixes "that" problem. However the texinfo problems are of totally 
>>> different nature.
>> Your recipe is lacking this important line:
> 
> Actually, I think it is  your receipe :) or Yann's to be precise.
> 
> https://www.opencsw.org/package/gnutls/
> 
> what I wonder is that here current version is 3.1.5, while I see the receipe 
> of 2.12.23 (which required a backport)

That is for the 2.x branch, GNUTLS3 is in gnutls3/

> I still want to have this version available on both solaris 9 & 10 to fix my 
> gnustep builds, however the next step would have been to upgrade to 3.x 
> series.
> 
> I see that there is a gnutls3 directory.  I think I am working on the wrong 
> package: an upload of a new 2.12 would break the "dev" part.
> 
> Better check my stuff.... I better spend having gnutls3 on solaris9 then. The 
> package names instead of a branch confused me.
> 
>>  CONFIGURE_ARGS = $(DIRPATHS)
> 
> I see it : just before --disable-guile

Ok.

GnuTLS3 is hard to compile on Solaris. I took a stab every once in a while but
always lost track at some point. Making GnuTLS3 work on Solaris at all together
with upstream would be quite some good time spent IMHO.


Best regards

  — Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to 
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to