> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 12:06:14 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Can someone take a look and comment on these bugs that were just filed:
I looked and replied. Only the first one is a real problem, IMO. > and the third is possibly already fixed by the parallelism changes that > were just introduced... or maybe not? I'm bewildered: the parallelism ``bug'' describes exactly the situation you told me was to be expected in a Make built without the job server support. Or am I missing something? > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15718 > > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15719 > > http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=15720 Btw, is it possible to arrange for bugs filed with Savannah bug tracker to be emailed to make-alpha or to bug-make and/or to this list? That way, the bugs will be noticed when they are filed, not when you ask ;-) _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
