%% Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> and the third is possibly already fixed by the parallelism changes >> that were just introduced... or maybe not?
ez> I'm bewildered: the parallelism ``bug'' describes exactly the ez> situation you told me was to be expected in a Make built without the ez> job server support. Or am I missing something? No; you're just giving me too much credit for examining these bugs :-). I didn't look at it closely enough to realize it was a jobserver situation. Thanks for looking at these, Eli! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist _______________________________________________ Make-w32 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/make-w32
