On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 02:39  PM, Ed Avis wrote:

On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Ken Williams wrote:

For example, some of my modules have "recommended" dependencies that
I can't express well using MakeMaker.
There is a lot of cruft in
<http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/xmltv/ xmltv/Makefile.PL?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/plain>
for handing 'recommended' dependencies in this way which you might be
able to use. But I agree, it is not expressed 'well'.
Module::Build already has a well-defined concept of recommended dependencies, but it could be better. I'm formulating a message to the module-build list right now that proposes some new dependency-checking stuff.

-Ken

Reply via email to