On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:29:09PM +0100, Robin Barker wrote: > >> Long text after C<=item> causes pod2man|nroff to wrap the text on the > >> *previous* line. > > > >Ummm, the thing to do is fix pod2man, not alter the perfectly valid POD to > >work around a bug. > > Agreed. > > But as POD is paragraph parsed the patch looked sane just the same > - the long line seemed to be part of the text rather than part of the > item tag.
Irregardless of whether or not its a syntactically sane patch, there's no purpose for it except to cover up a pod2man bug (one that I'm not seeing, BTW)
