On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> wrote: > Nicholas Clark wrote: >> Applied to blead as 1487aac67a72b9f87b24113f65b4d878401bee33 > > Thanks.
There's a new failure on VMS, but this should take care of it: http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=43511 >> should I be raising RT tickets for these instead? > > Keep raising RT tickets. Does that mean CPAN is upstream, as in: --- a/Porting/Maintainers.pl +++ b/Porting/Maintainers.pl @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ package Maintainers; lib/ExtUtils/t/{[0-9FLV-Zabdf-z]*,IN*,Mkbootstrap,MM_*,PL_FILES,cd,config}.t t/lib/MakeMaker t/lib/TieIn.pm t/lib/TieOut.pm], 'CPAN' => 1, - 'UPSTREAM' => undef, + 'UPSTREAM' => 'cpan', }, 'ExtUtils::Manifest' => [end of patch] ? Or is MakeMaker too essential to building the core for upstream to really mean anything? And is GitHub the best place to host MakeMaker, or could it be put on git.perl.org and pumpkings given write access for emergencies, like when there is a release coming up but Michael is away from e-mail for awhile. I'm just thinking out loud -- if that involves too much work by too many people, then just pulling from GitHub does look like an improvement over applying patches.
