sounds like fusion ain't hitting the tile cache??? On Nov 21, 2007 6:44 PM, Bruno Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have 2 identical vm-ware with windows 2003 running on the same machine > I start one of the vm-ware, I do the testing, I stop it and then start the > other to do the other bench Bench is done on the sheboygan sample at 1:5000 > scale > > MG 2.0 with fusion Mg 2.0 without fusion Mg 1.2 > > pan 29 sec 12 sec 2 sec > > select 28 sec 12 sec 2 sec > > > I know it's only a beta but why is that slow? > > Bruno Scott > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Mapguide-2.0-Beta1-vs-1.2-performance-tf4848550s16610.html#a13872479 > Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >
-- Zac Spitzer http://zacster.blogspot.com/ +61 405 847 168 (aussie moible) _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
