It uses the mapdefinition that is set in the application definition,
if its a tiled map then it should be tiled in the client, otherwise it
should be a regular old map draw.
Has anyone else got feedback on this? I saw fusion running on a
laptop yesterday, not tiled, full screen, and it was milliseconds
(<500ms) to pan/zoom (didn't look at select).
Paul
On 21-Nov-07, at 3:22 AM, Zac Spitzer wrote:
sounds like fusion ain't hitting the tile cache???
On Nov 21, 2007 6:44 PM, Bruno Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have 2 identical vm-ware with windows 2003 running on the same
machine
I start one of the vm-ware, I do the testing, I stop it and then
start the
other to do the other bench Bench is done on the sheboygan sample
at 1:5000
scale
MG 2.0 with fusion Mg 2.0 without
fusion Mg 1.2
pan 29 sec 12 sec 2 sec
select 28 sec 12 sec 2 sec
I know it's only a beta but why is that slow?
Bruno Scott
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mapguide-2.0-Beta1-vs-1.2-performance-tf4848550s16610.html#a13872479
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
--
Zac Spitzer
http://zacster.blogspot.com/
+61 405 847 168 (aussie moible)
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
_______________________________________________
mapguide-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
