Dear all I've spent a while looking at the documentation, white papers, blogs and mailing lists in order to try and get a bit more performance out of our MGE2009 Windows installation using SDFs. We need to seed a tile cache with many tiles and the predicted execution times are very large. I have two questions:
1. Is there anything I can do to tweak ISAPI in the same way as is suggested for FastCGI? I suppose not because when I run Zac's seeder, Task Manager is showing all eight cores being utilised equally. 2. Is there any advantage in loading our SDFs into a repository? At the moment they're just external. This page... http://sandbox.mapguide.com/index.php/Managed_versus_Unmanaged_Resources http://sandbox.mapguide.com/index.php/Managed_versus_Unmanaged_Resources ...says "In general the performance of managed and unamanaged resources are the same", but Zac on his blog at... http://zacster.blogspot.com/2008/10/mapguide-performance-tips.html http://zacster.blogspot.com/2008/10/mapguide-performance-tips.html ...says "Always use Managed Resources, that is SDF's uploaded into the repository". And as a follow-on, how does the size of the SDFs affect performance when loaded and external? We're currently playing with some external ones of around 6GB (which work fine). Appreciate your thoughts on all this. Thanks Stuart -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Two-performance-questions-tp2358277p2358277.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
