It would be nice to have the possibility to serve tiles from differents servers like google or yahoo. This would be a great performance advance.
Regards. gingerbbm wrote: > > Dear all > > I've spent a while looking at the documentation, white papers, blogs and > mailing lists in order to try and get a bit more performance out of our > MGE2009 Windows installation using SDFs. We need to seed a tile cache with > many tiles and the predicted execution times are very large. I have two > questions: > > 1. Is there anything I can do to tweak ISAPI in the same way as is > suggested for FastCGI? I suppose not because when I run Zac's seeder, Task > Manager is showing all eight cores being utilised equally. > > 2. Is there any advantage in loading our SDFs into a repository? At the > moment they're just external. This page... > > http://sandbox.mapguide.com/index.php/Managed_versus_Unmanaged_Resources > http://sandbox.mapguide.com/index.php/Managed_versus_Unmanaged_Resources > > ...says "In general the performance of managed and unamanaged resources > are the same", but Zac on his blog at... > > http://zacster.blogspot.com/2008/10/mapguide-performance-tips.html > http://zacster.blogspot.com/2008/10/mapguide-performance-tips.html > > ...says "Always use Managed Resources, that is SDF's uploaded into the > repository". > > And as a follow-on, how does the size of the SDFs affect performance when > loaded and external? We're currently playing with some external ones of > around 6GB (which work fine). > > Appreciate your thoughts on all this. > > Thanks > Stuart > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Two-performance-questions-tp2358277p2360400.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
