IE inside an intranet behaves differently than for internet sites. Hit F12 and compare Browser Mode and Document mode.
On 2011-03-21, Trevor Wekel <[email protected]> wrote: > There are at least 4 others submissions in trunk which are likely related to > IE9 compatibility. Look for "px". And that's just for the AJAX viewer. I > haven't looked into Fusion. The javascript libraries we depend on > (MooTools, OpenLayers, others?) may also require updates to pick up IE9 > fixes. > > The AJAX and Fusion viewers support multiple browsers (IE8, IE9, Firefox, > Chrome, Safari). Any changes we make will also need to be tested and > verified on all supported browsers. > > Checking in a bunch of IE9 compatibility fixes which break currently > supported browsers would be bad. I would prefer to move IE9 compatibility > to a bug fix release (2.2.1). I expect multiple test builds will be > required to get clean IE9 support. > > Regards, > Trevor > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew > DeMerchant > Sent: March 19, 2011 12:29 PM > To: MapGuide Users Mail List > Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] MapGuide Open Source 2.2 Release Candidate 4 > released > > > I'm not setup to build - so I can't do any patching...I could certainly do > some testing though, if someone could get me a test build. > > In other news, I just installed IE9 and tested out on my server which is > running MGOS v2.2.0.5354 (I think that's RC2)....worked perfectly fine for > me. My site's AJAX though - could be that the guy that posted about this > problem was either a) using Fusion (which I can't test right now, since I > don't have any Fusion sites), or b) had a beta of IE9 which was, indeed, > broken.....or maybe c) that the version after 2.2.0.5354 breaks > IE9 compatibility, I suppose. Though, that seems unlikely. > > Anyway - I just wanted to give my 2cents on this...I just think that we > should make sure that either MGOS 2.2 supports all major browsers out of the > box, or else gets a patch asap - I'm not sure when IE9 will be pushed out > through Windows Update and WSUS, but when it does, we need to be sure that > MGOS is up to snuff for it.....like I said, from what I can tell at the > moment, it seems to work fine (or worst case, worked fine very recently). > > Andrew > > > On 19/03/2011 11:53 AM, Zac Spitzer wrote: >> Alas. the ie9 fixes were made on trunk 4 months ago >> >> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/search?q=ie9&noquickjump=1&changeset=on >> >> I believe the 2.2 branch was cut 5 months ago >> >> Andrew, can you apply and test those change sets over a RC4 install? >> >> z >> >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Trevor Wekel >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> I believe there are some IE9 fixes present in the RC4 build and likely >>> more to come. I was not planning on holding back the 2.2.0 release for >>> IE9 support. I do agree it is an important feature. We are already >>> thinking about timing and content for a 2.2.1 bug fix release. >>> >>> Bug fix release? What's that? We haven't had one of those since 2.0.2 >>> (2.5 years ago). Most open source projects have bug fix releases every >>> quarter. Releases and bug fixes are certainly one area where funding >>> either by direct contract work or through Sponsorships/Donations would >>> certainly help. >>> >>> At the moment, we barely manage a single release every year. The 2.2.0 >>> release has been especially troublesome. We've generated four release >>> candidates since October. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Trevor >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew >>> DeMerchant >>> Sent: March 19, 2011 7:16 AM >>> To: MapGuide Users Mail List >>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] MapGuide Open Source 2.2 Release >>> Candidate 4 released >>> >>> >>> Does this RC fix the IE9 problems? I recall reading something on the list >>> that someone had posted about how Mapguide pretty much doesn't work with >>> IE9....Since it's out now, MGOS 2.2 really needs to support it fully. >>> Anyway, just wonrdering! I haven't had a chance to test it out myself >>> quite yet... >>> >>> Andrew >>> >>> >>> On 18/03/2011 10:06 PM, Zac Spitzer wrote: >>>> Just to Clarify, >>>> >>>> If you find a defect, please only report it using trac, AFTER first >>>> posting to the mailing list and having the issue confirmed >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Zac >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Trevor Wekel >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> We are pleased to announce that the MapGuide Open Source project team >>>>> has made MapGuide Open Source 2.2 Release Candidate 4 available. >>>>> >>>>> Release notes: >>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/Release/2.2RC4/Notes >>>>> Downloads: >>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/Release/2.2RC4/Notes#Installati >>>>> on >>>>> Documentation: Please continue to use the 2.0 documentation for now. >>>>> The release notes contain information on API changes between MapGuide >>>>> 2.1 and MapGuide 2.2. >>>>> >>>>> If you find a defect, please report it using trac. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks to the ever growing team of developers who are contributing to >>>>> make the MapGuide Open Source project a more self-sustaining project. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> The MapGuide PSC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> mapguide-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mapguide-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
