This is a MapHist list message (when you hit 'reply' you're replying to the
whole list)
o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o + o +
Whoops, sorry- communication over multiple time-zones can be awkward
sometimes. What is the etiquette for responding to a message posted on
April 1 but read on April 2?
David Bradbury
Whitehaven, UK
Dee Longenbaugh wrote:
Has anyone else in this august group heard that the Kunstcamera in St.
Petersburg has turned up a copy of the Vinland Map that is at least
200 years older? Apparently more tests are needed, but so far Russian
scholars are declaring it the genuine thing. This certainly puts a
different perspective on the long running dispute over the Vinland Map.
Dee,
waiting for more news
Dee Longenbaugh
_______________________________________________
MapHist: E-mail discussion group on the history of cartography
hosted by the Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht.
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of
Utrecht. The University of Utrecht does not take any responsibility for
the views of the author.
List Information: http://www.maphist.nl
Maphist mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.geo.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/maphist
